Have American whites lost their nationhood and then had it resurrected - by leftists? It would not be the first time a nation unknowingly transformed from a natural, organic nation into one whose existence is somewhat artificial and, therefore, whose very nature has changed. Rather like a science fiction tale of a human falling asleep as flesh and blood and waking up as an android.
No doubt some native American tribes, for whom membership used to require no paperwork and whose self-identity was as natural and flowing as the rivers around them now find themselves struggling to maintain a meaningful existence in a different world. They must keep computer files for members and follow practices previously unheard of just to maintain some semblance of continuity for their nation.
At a time when the United States was over 90% white, one could still accurately say that, by and large, America was a nation founded by whites and composed of whites. Back then, a white American's nationality could be defined by his U.S. citizenship. He could convincingly equate the two in most cases. Of course this is not so anymore. These days, "American" can mean anything and (as I've stated before) therefore it means nothing.
Thanks to leftist policies, which are specifically designed to marginalize and displace whites, America no longer exists as a nation. It has been reduced to nothing more than a specific territory ruled by an elite political class. Former white "Americans" have either lost any true sense of nationhood (their former patriotism having become a hollow fantasy) or else they have embraced their white heritage as their nation. The former have no nation. The latter now belong to a new nation - created indirectly by leftists.
Proud white Americans, being members of a new nation, may find themselves confused. On the one hand, they feel deeply rooted in their historical past. On the other hand, that past - though lived by their genetic forebears - was the past of different nations. In the meantime, the rules have changed. Things that used to be assumed must now be argued. Things that used to be safe must now be defended. Things that used to be sacred are now openly questioned. Things that used to be profane are now considered sacred. When faced with disruptions such as these, a people will typically take measures to preserve the culture they have inherited from their former nations. Unfortunately, those measures sometimes prove themselves to be as disruptive as the challenges that provoked them.
These are dangerous times for white peoples wherever they are. They are, of course, dangerous because of the widespread violence, hate propaganda and genocidal government policies directed against us - but they are also dangerous because of the ways we sometimes find ourselves reacting to such persecution. Unable to maintain the innocence of yesteryear, some of us may slide into mentalities that are not helpful. During his speech, at the most recent Amren conference, Sam Dickson urged caution lest we become like the caricatures our enemies use to portray us. Let us take his advice to heart. With one hand, let us defend our cultures, genetic legacies, language etc. but let the other hand steady us so that we remain normal, natural people. We cannot control the events that brought about our status as new nations - but we can control the ways we adapt to it. We can nurture our new nations in such a way that the artificiality of it takes on the qualities of a seamless transition still rooted in our past but well suited to forge ahead on our own terms.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"America no longer exists as a nation. It has been reduced to nothing more than a specific territory ruled by an elite political class. "
ReplyDeletePriceless.
With one hand, let us defend our cultures, genetic legacies, language etc. but let the other hand steady us so that we remain normal, natural people.
ReplyDeleteCouldn't have said it any better myself! We can fight on behalf of our people and improve our communities without becoming violent extremists. Every time a crazy white person goes nuts (ie. Timothy Mcveigh and Benjamin Smith), you just know our enemies are licking their chops.
We do need to start seriously fighting for our people. Raising hell over the pathetic cowardice of Comedy Central, which decided to censor South Park just because it depicted Muhammad (and not in a stereotypical light, mind you), would be a good start.
What angers me wasn't the decision itself, but the reason for the decision. It was a decision grounded in fear. Since a few Muslims are angry, we must suspend freedom of expression.
The whole incident made me want to vomit.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/ct-talk-jon-stewart-south-park-0424-20100423,0,6858122.story
Curt Doolittle,
ReplyDeleteIn a previous post you mentioned something about germany being invaded resulting in the stifling of the develoipment of a new religion. Were you referring to ww1, ww2, or some other war? Just curious what you were saying on that... because in ww2 it was kinda a weird time for Germany and I dont see that time period a s a cultural rennaisance.
I would be more specific in stating that America was founded as a country for Northwestern Europeans/Nordics. When the second great wave happened, it was not welcomed. And to this day, I think it had a bad effect on the founding stock. Very few White people on this continent think of themselves as Whites. For example, some many may only think of themselves as half-Irish and half-Italian(southern Italian usually). Hence, they already think of themselves as mixed, especially if they have ancestors from a place whose racial legacy obviously has non-Whites. That is one of the reason many White-Americans have no problem with miscegenation.
ReplyDeleteRomanticism is the mythological movement behind German unification in response to Napoleon's conquest of the previously fractured 300 principalities.
ReplyDeleteThe Roman's invaded europe because celts were metal workers and they had relative wealth that could be exploited.
The Church stopped the Germans from unifying because it would have threatened italian leadership. (Giving titles to princes)
The English Civilization conquered the germans to prevent them from expansion of their empire and posing a continental threat.
We ended up with a power vacuum that the russians and US filled.
The period of Nietzsche and Wagner and the romantic artists was the attempt to ostracize christianity from northern (germanic) europe.
This is well worn territory, oceans of writing on it. It's just not popular because the nazi's turned it into their program of mythology. In fact, it was an effort to implement greek and european myth by expunging christianity.
THe greeks for example, lost all writing after the collapse of Minoan civilization. One of the reasons for the revitalization of hellenic civilization was that they had lost their myths and effectively reinvented them and themselves accordingly.
My view is that we made the greatest mistake in history twice. Athens (naval) destroyed Sparta (army) just as england (naval) destroyed Germany (army). This event is perhaps the causal failure of both hellenic and western civilizations.
It never fails to amaze me how so many of the older generation bows down to diversity these days like they have completely lost their spine. I would have thought that they would be the most vociferous generation for returning to our roots, but time and time again I see them acting as openly PC as any leftist idiot.
ReplyDeleteI think with all people, yes even white people there are those who see the bigger picture, and those who don't. Those who don't are not interested in the world beyond family and friends, and when a reality check hits them they always conform to common thinking that’s espoused by the MSM. Very few of this latter group ever wakes up, and if they do, it would invariably be because of their friends and family who somehow got through to them.
These are the sheep we bemoan, and despise because of their timidity to step beyond their comfortable borders and make a stand for themselves. Want to make one of them wake up? Then let them lose their comfortable lifestyle. That would be the first step, and until that is done often times they would literally fight you to the death to maintain their fantasy world. These people are always the first to conform to contemporary thinking, because they are too afraid and helpless to stand on their own two feet.
I am sure these same people are the lesser among us. They would have lower IQs, lower drives, and lower levels of critical thinking. These are the people that play follow the leader, and never become the leaders themselves. Put them into positions of empowerment and we decline as a people, because they do everything in their power to maintain the status quo and never see the elephant in the room.
To respond to something you said I don't think that areas need to be politically unified in order to achieve cultural objectives.
ReplyDeleteSecondly the only wars I know of where England stifled German expansionism were ww1 and 2. Were you referring to ww1 specifically when you criticized the english or were you referring to both ww1 and 2... or was there some other war I am not aware of you were referring to?
I would be more specific in stating that America was founded as a country for Northwestern Europeans/Nordics.
ReplyDeleteIndeed. The anti-racists and non-whites can scream all they want about how we stole this "country" from the Native Americans (note: the Native Americans weren't living on any "country" until white men founded this nation. It amazes me how leftists conflate land with country).
However, the fact of the matter remains that this country was founded by and for whites. Up until the past few decades, this nation was a predominately white nation. This nation had an immigration policy deliberately designed to keep this nation majority white.
Pointing this out doesn't make us "hateful white supremacists." That's simply the truth. I think this is important to point out so whites feel like they have a stake in this country. Our founding fathers certainly didn't envision a multiracial rainbow. Our kids and young people should know that a multiracial land dominated by cultural Marxism didn't always exist.
To all you self-righteous anti-racists out there, I am aware that blacks and American Indians have been living on this land for as long if not longer than many whites. I am aware that blacks, for better or worse, have played a crucial role in the development of this nation. And yes, I'm also aware that the menial labor of immigrants from Asia and Latin America played an important role.
However, regardless of who performed the menial labor, this nation was envisioned by whites. The Constitution was written by whites. This nation's wars (which I know the anti-racists love to chastise us for) were primarily lead and fought by whites (regardless of the fact that non-whites frequently served in the military). The vast majority of great modern inventions have been white inventions, regardless of what some blacks try to claim.
Of course, I realize that it's too late to completely reverse the negative changes over the past few decades, but something must be done.
White do need to reinvent themselves. If our ancestors could see us now, they would be rolling in their graves.
Just to clarify, this isn't some endorsement of Jim Crow, lynchings, or the "good ol' days" in that sense. We white advocates shouldn't romanticize the past too much, because anti-racists will immediately jump on us for being racists who wish to relegate blacks to the back of the bus.
ReplyDeleteThere were better solutions towards eliminating anti-black racism than integration, "diversity," and cultural Marxism. Had whites listened more to Malcolm X and other black nationalists, and less to MLK and integrationists, both blacks and whites wouldn't have as many problems today.
But anyway, I digress.
The good thing about the "good ol' days" that I would like to revive in whites is pride, better behavior (ie. fewer drugs, less drinking, no more school shooters, etc. Just to clarify, I know that whites engaged in negative behaviors back then, but nowhere near as much as they do today) , greater patriotism, more stable families (ie. fewer divorces or out of wedlock births), etc.
Jew Among You, you mentioned to me the need for us to create such an organization that fights on behalf of whites while cleaning up white communities. Any suggestions for where I should start?
Thanx for your reply, woud you agree that it was uncivilized for the nazis to exterminate people? I would like to say that too often people ignore the significance of class although class mobility is goog there are class differences.
ReplyDeleteRe: Bay Area Guy's question "Any suggestions for where I should start?" I have no experience setting up any organization nor do I have a well-thought-out plan at this point. I suppose coming up with a good name would be a good start. Let's see some suggestions!
ReplyDeleteRe: Curt's long post. That's pretty intense stuff you've got there and thanks for sharing your ideas here.
ReplyDeleteI don't think I can come up with a new and original name that hasn't already been taken.
ReplyDeletePerhaps naming ourselves after a great European/Caucasoid pioneer would be suitable. Any individuals that come to mind?
You are welcome. I'm very impressed by the quality of your writing. It's rational and positive. Invective and sentiment alone (which is all most people are capable of articulating) are not sufficient to solve anything. Analysis and criticism are, because they help us argue against Democratic Secular Humanists, and their one-world fantasy using their language against them, and by employing simple facts.
ReplyDeleteThis morning I'm working on a graphic that shows IQ distributions and invention thresholds. I'm trying to add a dimension to it for corruption by culture as shown by Huntington (truth telling).
I'll share it with you whenever I get it done.
Name? It's called 'Nationalism'. During the feudal period, cities usually had multiple sects, and racial and cultural groups were spread across europe. Napoleon created the concept of 'total war' and the nation-state, and the nationalist sentiment and ethic that was required to enlist the entire population in total-war (mobilizing the entire economy for war.) The rest of europe, and in particular, the slavic peoples, sought autonomy, in particular against the german austrians. Meanwhile, germans had become the merchant class in much of the eastern states, and germany sought to protect them.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rise_of_nationalism_in_Europe
So, the problem with anti-racists is that they are IMPERIALISTS. Cults of empire. New Napoleons. Nationalism is the counter to imperialism. Multiculturalism is the counter to Nationalism. But multiculturalism is only possible within a dominant majority state, whereby the ruling class is not open to fracture, and groups cannot use the violence of law for group competition and privilege.
So, as a political movement, the word you're looking for is nationalism. As an educational movement the word you're looking for is realism.
Cheers
It's pretty strange to see a Jew calling himself white in the context of white nationalism.
ReplyDeleteAren't the "political elites" waging war on whites mostly Jewish, who (accurately) perceive themselves as not white?
Most of the reasons for our white demographic plight are in changes in immigration law and promotion of miscegenation. Jewish organizations paid for and wrote the Immigration Act of 1965, and Jewish hands are on every pro-miscegenation book and television show.
Don't you see that Jews are a major source, if not the source of white dispossession?
"Don’t you see that Jews are a major source, if not the source of white dispossession?" You should read some of my earlier posts.
ReplyDeleteAren’t the “political elites” waging war on whites mostly Jewish, who (accurately) perceive themselves as not white?
ReplyDeleteThe 'Anglo-American' putative 'elites' have also been greatly responsible for betraying their nation's race, heritage and culture in favor of Globalism and the worship of Mammon.
Sorry, but you cannot overlook this truism. Greed on our White Anglo 'leaders' part -- now and through much of the twentieth century -- was a major factor in our dispossession.